http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/americas/21haiti.html?ref=world
This New York Times article states that because of untreated injuries, health conditions in Haiti are worsening by the day and are remaining to be a major medical crisis.
It seems as though the article shows accuracy, and the reporter made no mistakes. The traumatic event is very recent and the reporter is keeping individuals up to date with the results of the earthquake. Most of the comments related to the article that were sent by people tend to agree with the article and are sending their positive thoughts to Haiti.
The reporter does a good job of naming sources, for example when Dr. Eduardo states "There are still thousands of patients with major fractures, major wounds, that have not been treated yet", the reporter clearly states his name and important facts about him right after his direct quote. He also uses reports from the World Food Program and the head of the World Health Organization.
The article is complete. It is based on a certain point and put in vital information. It allowed individuals to become more informed on how people are handling themselves in the devastated country of Haiti. It is also warning people that the increasing amount of injured people are very close to death if they don't get treated immediately.
As far as being fair, the article demonstrates a great balance and all sides are presented. It isn't meant to offend any particular individual nor it is spreading any rumors about anyone. There shouldn't be any reason for anyone to be mad at the reporter for writing this article.
The writer did a good job of not including his opinion and sticking to information given to him by other sources.
As I mentioned earlier, the news story gets straight to the point which makes the article brief and focused. It is a short article and stays on track through the reading.
Finally, the story is well-written, meaning it is clear and has a good flow with a lack of mistakes.